Chickens cause heart attacks

There are many potential bad foods lurking in supermarkets. The innocent chicken may be one of them. Did you know chickens cause heart attacks? Chickens cause kidney disease? Probably not. Americans buy more chicken than any other food at the center of the plate. Total chicken consumption per capita has increased nearly every year since the mid 1960’s. One among 200,000 people may suffer a heart attack from eating chicken.

Eating chicken may lead to heart attacks. That also includes turkey. For some people, eating poultry may result in a heart condition. Yes, the meat considered a healthier alternative to beef and pork, chicken meat may be at the root of heart problems.

Hyperhomocysteine or “Homocystinuria is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder (≈1:200 000 births), an inherited disorder of the metabolism of the amino acid methionine. While chicken is considered a low fat and high protein source (and economical and tasty), those with this genetically transmitted condition may receive a heart attack (over time) by consuming chicken, turkey, or other poultry. Yes, chickens cause heart attacks.

Those with Hyperhomocysteinemia condition, involving homocysteine as “characterized by chemical reactivity supporting a wide range of molecular effects, and a tendency to promote oxidant stress-induced cellular toxicity” may be sensitive to a protein found in chicken meat. High blood levels of homocysteine have been associated with artery breakdown and heart attacks. For over a decade, most doctors do not routinely test for homocysteine levels.

High homocysteine levels, generally above 10 in blood test scores, may increase heart attack risks by up to nearly 20%.

Poultry, such as chicken or turkey, have a protein-based amino acid called L-methionine. This is normally not problematic. There are those people that may have problems with L-methionine metabolism. A single serving of chicken may elevate homocysteine blood levels, per American Heart Association study. Formation of high homocysteine levels are the result in that group of people who are sensitive to methionine that may metabolize into homocysteine. For these people chicken is toxic. “Homocystinuria is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder (≈1:200 000 births) that usually results from defective activity of cystathionine synthase, as a deficiency.

The risk of untested homocysteine may confound LDL cholesterol levels by marginal to significant levels. Can dietary chicken be one of the culprits?

While there is little inference of causality due to small studies, increased homocysteine levels seem to to be found in renal patients – diseases of the urine tract and the kidneys.

A relative of mine, as an example, had a homocysteine based heart attack over 20 years ago. He was treated by normal cardio-logical treatments, with no recurrence. He died 20 years later due to kidney problems and renal cancer. In cases such as this, high homocysteine levels may have factored in both the heart attack and renal diseases.

If L-Methiaonine is a known factor associated with renal variables, some health practitioners find benefit from L-Methiaonine for liver problems. Nutritionists suggest uses of L-Methionine:

A deficiency of methionine can lead to inflammation of the liver (steatohepatitis), anemia, and greying hair. However, a diet low in methionine may also extend lifespan and reduce risk of cancer. High methionine foods include nuts, beef, lamb, cheese, turkey, pork, fish, shellfish, soy, eggs, dairy, and beans.

Then some nutritionists make these recommendations for reducing homocysteine blood levels:

Eat less fatty meat, more fish and vegetable protein Eat no more than four servings of lean meat a week; fish (not fried) at least three times a week; and if you’re not allergic or intolerant, a serving of a soya-based food, such as tofu, tempeh or soya sausages, plus beans, such as kidney beans, chickpea hummus, and chickpeas.

According to Dr. Andrew Weil, elevated homocysteine levels associated with heart and dementia probabilities may be managed this way:

“To lower homocysteine levels, Dr. Weil recommends increasing your intake of B vitamins, particularly folate, and moderating stress. The richest food sources of folate (the form of folic acid found in food) are green vegetables, orange juice and beans. Dr. Weil also recommends taking a multivitamin that gives you 400 micrograms of folic acid in addition to what you might get from your diet. (Some people might absorb this vitamin better in supplement form, which Dr. Weil considers good insurance.) To reduce stress, Dr. Weil advises practicing breathing exercises, meditation and mind-body exercises such as yoga.”

Generally, homocysteine maintenance at normal levels are results of vitamin therapy. You will see homocysteine nutrients in most supplement sections. Homocysteine is normally changed into other amino acids for use by the body. If your homocysteine level is too high, you may not be getting enough B vitamins to help your body use the homocysteine.

Most people who have a high homocysteine level don’t get enough folate (also called folic acid), vitamin B6 or vitamin B12 in their diet. Replacing these vitamins often helps return the homocysteine level to normal. Other possible causes of a high homocysteine level include low levels of thyroid hormone, kidney disease, psoriasis, some medicines or when the condition runs in your family.

It was once a generally accepted notion that a diet rich poultry and eggs elevated homocysteine levels linked to heart, artery, dementia, and renal diseases. At least, in certain people. Rat studies show that chicken protein complexes may also reduce homocysteine levels.

In the last 20 years, homocysteine and C-Reactive Protein levels have taken steps back to overall cholesterol levels as possible disease predictors, per many insurances.

If you have suspicions of elevated homocysteine blood levels, speak to your doctor and ask for testing. For most, balance may be found through nutritional supplementation or vitamins. Dr. Patrick Frattelone believes that nutritional balance is best for normal people. For those with higher levels of homocysteine, reducing chicken and eggs, he believes, offer benefit.

Should you bother to avoid eating chickens? Not really. Only unless you have high homocysteine levels in a medical blood test. Most likely, you won’t be aware of it. Most doctors, including cardiologists, test for homocysteine. That seems very irresponsible doesn’t it?

Not necessarily so! Homocystinuria occurs in approximately 1 out of 200,000. That is very far from average. The bells toll more frequently for more heart attacks from overall LDL cholesterol and excess body fat. Even holistic approaches to medical care might easily overlook homocysteine and its association with a primary food group.

Why do doctors fail to add homocysteine tests for routine blood analysis? Doctors and insurances tend to overlook deviations from average. It may have something to do with routines according to specialization. Homocysteine may relate to heart, arteries, renal, Alzheimer, and a host of other conditions. Finding an integrative approach usually does not fall into average medical care. You can consult with your physician to add the test. But why the suspicion?

If you are monitoring less than ideal cholesterol levels, homocysteine levels have been recognized to help predict hear disease probabilities. If life and living is important to you, be assertive to get the fuller picture. Answers might be easy or difficult. That’s life – states of confusion reaching for happiness. Homocysteine readings are similar. Who should be tested for homocysteine?

Next time you walk through the poultry section at the supermarket, choose a chicken. Roast it. Enjoy it. Just be aware. Among the other customers, who might have homocystinuria, may be the victim of a heart attack. It may even be you. Evil lurks without evidence. Chickens may be inadvertent murderers. Chickens cause heart attacks and one might be yours. Or not.

PGAD persistent genital arousal disorder

Everyone’s fantasy beyond dreams might be another’s nightmare. For all those seeking greater sexual powers through use of Viagra and other sexual stimulants, there are those who wish they would just disappear. PGAD or persistent genital arousal disorder is a recognized medical disorder ” characterized by unrelenting, spontaneous and uncontainable genital arousal in females.”

As there are few complaints about hypersexuality, patients are known to suffer greatly. The causes of PGAD are fundamentally unknown and generally perceived to have little or nothing to do with sexual desire. There are few recorded associations in psychology. Sexual health physicians and researchers may believe this condition may be due to sensitive nerves and the neurotransmitters they ignite in the brain.

In a relatively small study, 18 PGAD women were given MRI exams of the pelvic and lower spine regions. Drs. Komisaruk and Lee found that 12 of the 18 women, or 66.7%, had Tarlov cysts in the S2 or S3 sacral spinal area. Presence of Tarlov cysts may result in clitoral tingling, irritation, vaginal congestion, vaginal contractions, throbbing,
pressure, pain, and in some cases, spontaneous orgasms. They may also be factored with ” bladder dysfunction, urinary incontinence, micturition disorders, bowel incontinence, radicular pain (neuralgia), loss of sensibility, and muscle weakness.

Tarlov Cysts, however, do not explain why Tarlov Cyst presence may offer many symptoms that are NOT necessarily PGAD. The small test, where 12 or 18 had Tarlov cysts is broadly inconclusive.

Yet PGAD and PSAS has been examined by news media. PSAS or persistent sexual arousal syndrome preceded PGAD as sufferers discussed that it had very little to do with sexual arousal. It is not considered sexy. This video from ABC news 20/20 shows how disarming PGAD can be.

PSAS and PGAD should not be confused with a psychological diagnosis of hypersexuality (sometimes known as nymphomania) where the woman displays a compulsive sexual desire and need for sex. This is a compulsive disorder.

PGAD is a rare nerve disorder that may deviate sexual arousal or the “sex reflex of the brain. Many neurocognitive studies have cited evidence that female brains may be organized somewhat differently than male brains, in terms of arousal, color, and taste.

PGAD is rare and definitely no laughing matter. From neurotransmitters, hormones, nerves and other possible sources, there really have been no conclusive inferences that might point to causality. PGAD symptoms go back to around 2007 and little research has followed up in the USA. PGAD has no significant lobby groups and is not classed as a disability due to its distressing reactions. Stress and anxiety may also aggravate symptoms. While there are many treatments to enhance sexual arousal. PGAD has no proven treatments. PGAD is a very hard, uncomfortable, grim reality.

For those who fantasize about constant sexual arousal, PGAD shows that you should be careful what you wish for. The constant arousal among those with PGAD may lead to distressing and even fatal consequences.

Dental floss health claims unproven

Nobody really wants to go to the dentist. Dentists advise that use of dental floss between meals may help reduce cavities and the incidence of gum disease. The Associated Press (AP) looked at the most rigorous research conducted over the past decade. 25 studies were examined and evaluated that generally compared the use of a toothbrush with the combination of toothbrushes and floss. According to the AP, there is insufficient evidence that flossing with dental floss routinely offers claimed health benefits.

Of course, this lack of evidence may be due to to two federal government agencies eliminating dental floss from recommendations. Despite support from dental professionals, use of dental floss has shown no major evidence of preventing gum inflammation. Another study indicated no evidence in 2011 and indicated that incorrect dental floss use may have resulted in gum inflammation.

By reviewing more dental floss efficacy studies, there seems to be an appearance that all are small and short. without meeting a representative sample of the population. The controls are loose and one or two may have been sponsored by manufacturers of alternative products. Yet, dental professionals seem to push the advice that flossing should be a daily part of your dental hygiene routine.

Dental hygiene normally appeals to vanity. Good oral hygiene results in a mouth that looks and smells healthy, with bright white teeth.

Dental hygiene wasn’t even a main part of dentistry until 1908 when the profession was introduced. The history of using toothpicks and dental floss, however, is found hundreds to thousands of years ago. Dental floss drew greater focus that there was more than keeping your pearly whites shining. Gum disease threatened their existence. It was once considered fact that tooth loss was part of the normal aging process. Dental hygiene and gum disease treatment appears to show that people keep their teeth longer than ever.

Gum disease is professionally called gingivitis or periodontal disease. According to the Center of Disease Control in 2012, 2009 and 2010 estimates that 47.2 percent, or 64.7 million American adults, have mild, moderate or severe periodontal disease. In adults 65 and older, prevalence rates increase to 70.1 percent. Gum disease is the culprit that may increase tooth loss with aging.

Gum disease treatment costs are very high, often stemming to the thousands of dollars. Contributors to these statistics might be that half of documented USA citizens live below poverty levels. Dental insurance isn’t readily available. Gum disease treatment is overlooked as routine treatment for many.

Whether dental floss is unproven to prevent gum disease development mustn’t be an issue. Diet and routine dental hygiene are. While there are good bacteria and bad bacteria, these microscopic critters live in your mouth, along gum lines and form plaque. They live off foods you eat. It isn’t merely carbohydrates but those healthy foods that get stuck between teeth. Those stuck foods provide ample storage supplies for more bacteria. Can brushing your teeth effectively remove those foods? The answers lie whether your brushing is thorough and long.

Toothpicks and dental floss primarily target those foods between teeth that may be more threatening than surface areas that brushes easily reach. Psychologically, the idea is to motivate patients to add use to normal routine dental hygiene. As with all advisement, you can’t create a habit unless a real threat exists.

Plaque, like cities, expand. They move beneath gum lines, sometimes where more food deposits remain. The bacterial movement beneath your visible gums result with inflammation of the gums that is called “gingivitis.” Sometimes bacteria eat the gums themselves. In gingivitis, the gums become red, swollen and can bleed easily, losing integrity to support teeth. Bleeding gums often is an alert to seek help of a dentist.

This bacterial expansion contributes to the development of these symptoms. Deeper professional examination will indicate whether the roots of teeth and other components are viable or need replacement. Untreated gum disease is why normal people lose their teeth as they age. Spread of infection, left untreated, may result in pain or death. Should you worry about dental floss health claims that are not medically proven?

As to dental floss health claims being unproven, there are alternate wisdom paths to help stop bacteria expansion. It is possible to have gum disease at any age and have no warning signs. Diet, bite shape, and genetics may be associated with gum disintegration. These are reasons why regular dental checkups and gum probing for inflammation are very important. Frequent visits (at least two up to four) to a dental hygienist for professional cleanings are extremely beneficial. Brush your teeth thoroughly twice a day, clean between your teeth daily (using a toothpick if you don’t want floss), eat a balanced diet, and use a dental rinse. There are even floss picks for added convenience.

A few years ago, oral irrigation claims were medically disproved. The goal is to dislodge food particles stuck between your teeth on a routine basis, sometimes several times a day. Using disposable toothpicks is a remarkably affordable option that dates back many centuries.

Nobody really wants to go to the dentist. Much of the pain is in your mind. Dentists now have many methods of effective sedation. Dental floss may not be for you. Vigilance is essential focus on dental health over a lifetime.

As to the 50% living below poverty, Local, State, and Federal governments must examine and allow access to routine dental care. Routine dental care is as necessary as routine health check-ups in any society. At least, make toothpicks more available, if dental floss is too expensive.